The Entirely Logical explanation of God for Atheists


The context of this is important.
I was preaching to the commemoration of the departed.

I don’t know what you all believe.
I can’t rest my sermon on tradition.
So I’m going to tell you what I believe.


We all know love exists
Us being here today proves we know love.
(or if you weren’t there, Ill assume you love something)
God is love
Us being here today proves love Outlasts us.
(or if you weren’t there, I’ll assume someone you love has passed on)
God is eternal
and God is love
Therefore, love is eternal 
The people we love aren’t just with the source of love.
They are with love itself, the active prescient dynamic force of love

Love that gives everything to be with the object of its love
That kind of love
Love that knows us before we are born
Love that knows those we love here today and just with him
Right now, this second knows them now.
Present tense
Isn’t that wonderful?

Our loved ones are with perfect love.
When we love, we bring that kingdom of love a little closer because we bring what God is a little closer.
So today, by being here and remembering those we love, we brought his kingdom closer by bringing the love we have for them here
So we brought them closer as well.
God is everything at all times at once
So that means he is with us and everyone ever at all times at once
That means so is love
Those we lost  are with that love at all times, everywhere at once
And today, we remember them and the love that’s with them and with us.
I am convinced one day, we will all be together with love.
As we are now, as we will forever be.

Amen

2 responses to “The Entirely Logical explanation of God for Atheists”

  1. curious how a god that has to eternally torture people for not agreeing with it isn’t “love” but an abusive failure. your poor god fails to even meet the definition of love in 1 corinthians.

    Like

    1. By this comment you are playinng both sides, either by A) not showing love, or by dying for us, which ecludes love by its brutality.
      Then you say its a brutal death, or it doesntcount because he is alive. All these are substition arguments. There are others

      Your understanding of it as a brutal sacrifice is all according to how you think his death may have atoned, by
      A) substitition,
      B) by victory over death,
      c) or by moral victory?

      Or by all three.

      Like

Leave a reply to clubschadenfreude Cancel reply